A second appeal filed by M/s. Deboo And Co. was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent when the matter was called on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.02.12 GONSALVES 16:16:37 +0530
223.sa500-97.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.500 OF 1997
M/s. Deboo And Co. ...Appellant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
None for the Appellant.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 9 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C. :
. Perused the orders dated 10 January 2024 and 15 January 2024. Today again when the matter was called out, none present for the appellant. In view of that, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
1 / 1
M/s. Deboo And Co.
The State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court