Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to withdrawal of the underlying suit in the trial court, rendering a claim for a proposition of law untenable.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous and the pending application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-caa-1145-2016 in aost-20215-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 20215 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1145 OF 2016 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 20215 OF 2016
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Shri Idar Choudashi Tapodhan Brahman Seva Sangh-Mumbai & Ors. ..Respondents
Ms. Smita V. Tondwalkar, for the Appellant. Mr. M. B. Babu i/b. G. S. Bhat, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 8 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.02.0814:26:18+0530
. The learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that appellant has already withdraw the suit which was pending before the learned trial Court. They further submit that in view of the withdrawal of the suit, nothing survives in this appeal from order. In view of this, the appeal from order stands dismissed, as infructuous. Pending application also stands disposed of.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 1 of 1
Mamta Kale
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Shri Idar Choudashi Tapodhan Brahman Seva Sangh-Mumbai & Ors.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
