The High Court dismissed a second appeal for non-prosecution as no instructions were received from the deceased sole appellant. Pending civil/interim applications were accordingly disposed of.
Second Appeal dismissed; pending civil/interim application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 Sa-465-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2015
Mahadeo Vishavnath Pethkar. ...Appellant. Versus
Dattu Ramchandra Kolekar
Since deceased Thr. L.Rs. and Others.
...Respondents.
Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure i/b Ms. Stefy J. Dias for the Respondent Nos.1A/1, 1A/4, 1A/5 and 1B.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : April 16, 2024.
P. C. :
1. On the last occasion, this Court had recorded the statement of learned counsel appearing for the appellant that no instructions have been received from the heirs of deceased sole appellant. Today, none appears for the appellant.
2. Second appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
3. In view of the disposal of Second Appeal, nothing survives for consideration in the pending civil/interim application and the same is disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/04/2024 12:08:14
Mahadeo Vishavnath Pethkar
Dattu Ramchandra Kolekar
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court