Second appeal against a decree concerning shares in ancestral properties. Court heard the appellants' counsel and issued notice to respondents on two framed substantial questions of law regarding perversity of the Appellate Court's findings. Notice returnable within six weeks; matter not yet decided on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 6 sa30.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY : NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
SECOND APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2024
SMT. ANYSAYA Wd/o ANANDRAO BORKAR AND ANOTHER.
VERSUS
SMT. KAMAL ANANDRAO BORKAR AND OTHERS
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Mr. V. N. Morande, Advocate for the appellants
CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 22, 2024.
( G. A. SANAP, J.)
Signed by: DIWALE Diwale Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/02/2024 11:47:55
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Appellate Court erred by not granting the plaintiffs 1/3rd share each in ancestral properties of Anandrao described in category A & B of Table-1.
Whether the Appellate Court failed to properly appreciate oral and documentary evidence, rendering the judgment perverse.
Smt. Anysaya wd/o Anandrao Borkar
Another
Smt. Kamal Anandrao Borkar
Others
G. A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
