Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellants were absent on the date of hearing; pending civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES JOHNSON Date: 2024.05.03 GONSALVES 00:07:29 +0530
2.sa279-08.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2008 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.205 OF 2009
Arjun Haribhau Ubhe And Ors.
...Appellants/Applicants
vs.
Kashinath Ahilu Ubhe And Ors.
...Respondents
None for the Appellants.
Mr Tanaji Mhatugade, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Mr Vijaykumar Dighe, for Respondent Nos.6, 8, 9 and 10.
Mr Sudesh Shukla, a/w. Mr Aditya Ghatge, for Respondent No.12.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 2 May 2024
P.C. :
. Today, when the matter is called out, none present for the appellants. Earlier also none appeared for the appellants. The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending civil application also stands disposed of.
1 / 1
Arjun Haribhau Ubhe
Kashinath Ahilu Ubhe
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
