Bail application under Section 439? No—anticipatory bail application became infructuous after the Sessions Court granted bail; High Court disposed of the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.05.02 Chitra Sonawane. 1 15:44:25 903-BA-696-2023.doc +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Cri.Bail Application No.696 of 2023
Yogesh @ Bunty SUbhash Chawan ... Applicant. Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent.
Mr Rohan Kaiche, apponted Advocate for applicant. Ms Shilpa Talhar , APP for respondent/State.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 30 April 2024.
P.C. :
The learned APP drew the attention of this Court to the order below Exh.3 in Sessions Court No.377 of 2022, dated 27 July 2022 and submits that the applicant has already been granted bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan. In view of this, nothing survives in this application, and it stands disposed of as infructuous.
[ R. N. Laddha, J. ]
Yogesh @ Bunty Subhash Chawan
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
