The single judge allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal on the grounds that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute. Consequently, the appeal and pending application were dismissed and disposed of respectively.
Leave to withdraw the appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE SANJAY Date: SONAWANE 2024.04.19 Chitra Sonawane. 10:52:14 1 39-AO-231-2022.doc +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Appeal from Order No.231 of 2022
a/w
Interim Application No.1612 of 2022
Jaysingh Manohar Nagvekar .… Appellant. Vs.
.... Jagruti Jaysingh Nagvekar Respondent.
Mr Harshad Sathe for appellant.
Coram : R. N. Laddha, J. Date : 18 April 2024.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. He states that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably. Leave granted as prayed for. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, the pending application also stands disposed of.
[ R. N. Laddha, J. ]
Jaysingh Manohar Nagvekar
Jagruti Jaysingh Nagvekar
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
