Single judge dismissed a review petition filed against an order regarding land acquisition rights and alternate land allocation, holding that production of a new statement dated 1988 could not ground a review.
Review petition dismissed; interim application for amendment also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-RPW-16-2024.docx
Neeta Sawant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 16 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11287 OF 2018
Sadashiv Balshiram Neharkar } .. Applicant/ Orig. Respondent No.5. : Versus : Hanman Baburao Neharkar and Ors. } .. Respondents/ Orig. Petitioners
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7969 OF 2024
IN
REVIEW PETITION NO. 16 OF 2024
Sadashiv Balshiram Neharkar } .. Applicant In the matter Between : Shri. Hanumant Baburao Neharkar and Ors. } ... Orig. Petitioners : Versus : State of Maharashtra and Ors. } .. Respondents
Mr. P.B. Shah i/by. Ms. Mallika R. Pujari, for the Applicant.
Mr. U.B. Nighot a/w. Ms. Sulajja R. Patil , for the Respondents.
Mrs. D.S. Deshmukh,AGP for State.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 6 May 2024.
_____Page No. 1 of 3____
6 May 2024
32-RPW-16-2024.docx
Neeta Sawant
P.C. :
1) This petition is fled seeking review of the Judgment and Order dated 22 December 2023 passed by this Court.
2) I have heard Mr.Shah, the learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner.
3) The sheet anchor of the Review Petitioner for seeking review of the Order dated 22 December 2023 is alleged statement of Baburao Baban Neharkar recorded on 18 January 1988, under which said Baburao had allegedly released his rights in respect of the alternate land to be allotted in lieu of acquisition of the joint family property.
_____Page No. 2 of 3____
6 May 2024
32-RPW-16-2024.docx
Neeta Sawant
ground is made out for review of the order. The Review Petition is dismissed .
5) With dismissal of the Review Petition itself, Interim Application taken out for amendment does not survive. The same also stands disposed of.
Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.05.07 10:36:21 +0530
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
_____Page No. 3 of 3____
6 May 2024
Sadashiv Balshiram Neharkar
Hanman Baburao Neharkar
State of Maharashtra
Sandeev V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court