Application and FIR at page No.90. After reading the same, she would submit that when accused No.1 was apprehended on the incident spot, he disclosed that he alongwith the Revision Applicant who was also apprehended alongwith him were carrying out the business of sale of cannabis after procuring the same from Visakhapatnam. She would submit that compliance of mandatory provisions of Section 50(1) of the NDPS Act was done by the police officers and on conducting search, substantial cannabis of 10.86 kg. was found from the bag possessed by the accused No.1, as also another consignment of 5.364 kg. was found from the bag possessed by accused No.3. She would submit that the statement recorded by accused No.1 that he alongwith accused No.2 (Revision Applicant before me) were into the business and on the given date of incident they had come to transact sale of cannabis with accused No.3 namely Laxman Kumbhar, who had also arrived at the incident spot to collect the said goods from them holds true since all three accused have been apprehended. Both, accused No.1 and accused No.2 are residents of adjacent villages namely Karanjvihire and Mahalunge Ingale. There was no reason for accused No.2 to arrive at the incident spot on the said date if it is his case that he has nothing to do with the accused No.1 who has named him alongwith accused No.1.
