Revision application challenging maintenance order is dismissed. Court finds applicant has earning capacity and family property, and the ordered amount is minimal.
Criminal Revision Application dismissed; impugned maintenance order affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date: 2024.06.14 10:43:50 +0530
14-revn-222-2024.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 222 OF 2024
Vilas Bal Lahane
… Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr … Respondents
Mr. Viraj Shelatkar, for Applicant.
Mr. A.R. Metkari, APP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 11th JUNE 2024
P.C. :-
for the applicant has tendered copy of the Criminal Revision Application which is taken on record.
Page no. 1 of 3
14-revn-222-2024.doc
Page no. 2 of 3
14-revn-222-2024.doc
he is unable to make any payment cannot be accepted. There is nothing on record to show that the respondent no. 2 has any other source of income. Both the courts after examining the record and the evidence has passed an order of maintenance. The amount of maintenance is a minimal amount. Hence, I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned maintenance order can be interfered with given the applicant's claim of no income.
Whether the attachment of the auto rickshaw prevents the applicant from paying maintenance.
Vilas Bal Lahane
The State of Maharashtra
Anr
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
