Allowed
Kanchan Nilesh Deotale v. Mr. Nilesh Tejram Deotale
Bombay HCIA/9294/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Conditional time granted to remove office objections; application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-IA-9294-2024.docx
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9294 OF 2024
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 205 OF 2022
Mrs. Kanchan Nilesh Deotale
… Applicant
Vs.
Mr. Nilesh Tejram Deotale … Respondents
Mr. Suresh Dhole a/w. Mr. Pravin Mengane and Ms. Anuja Dhole for the Petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 11th JUNE 2024
P.C.
1. This application is for setting aside the conditional order dated
28th November 2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial II) granting conditional time to remove office objections. Office objections
were not removed within time, hence the Contempt Petition stood dismissed.
office objections within one week from today.
Digitally signed RAJESHWARI by RAJESHWARIRAMESH PILLAI RAMESH PILLAI Date:2024.06.12 10:45:38 +0530
1/2
20-IA-9294-2024.docx
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Mrs. Kanchan Nilesh Deotale
Mr. Nilesh Tejram Deotale
GAURI GODSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court