In a criminal revision application concerning an offence under the Bombay Prohibition Act, this Court held that the proceedings abated as the appellant had died. The revision was dismissed and records returned.
Application abated due to death of appellant; records returned to trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1007-CrRn-4-06.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2006
BABA @ DASHRATH TULSHIRAM MHASKE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Prafful J. Sagalgile holding for Mr. Rahul R. Karpe APP for Respondent : Smt. V. S. Choudhari
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 06-08-2024
PER COURT :-
under Section 85(1) of the then Bombay Prohibition Act.
rrd
BABA @ DASHRATH TULSHIRAM MHASKE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
