This court disposed of the criminal application. The learned Judge held that the proceeding under Section 156(3) CrPC abated as the complainant died in 2021 and no legal heirs were likely to continue it.
The criminal application was disposed of as the proceedings are abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:17292
1004-CrAn-1059-10.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1059 OF 2010
SAKHARAM RAMRAO SANGADE AND OTHERS VERSUS SHIVDAS SAMBHAJI DHAWALE AND OTHERS
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. R. S. Patil APP for Respondents No.2 and 3 : Smt. P. V. Diggikar
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 06-08-2024
PER COURT :-
( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE
rrd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceeding under Section 156(3) CrPC stands abated on the death of the complainant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sakharam Ramrao Sangade and others
Shivdas Sambhaji Dhawale and others
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
