The High Court of Bombay dismissed PIL No. 87 of 2024 as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, directing future petitions to be based on appropriate pleadings.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
401-ospil87-2024-modified.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.87 OF 2024
Ummed Singh Nahata … Petitioner V/s. Union of India, Ministry of Environmental & Forest … Respondent
Ms. Anita Bafna for the petitioner.
Digitally signed byATUL ATUL GANESH GANESH KULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2025.01.08 16:55:49 +0530
Mr. Abhay L. Patki, Additional G.P. for respondent No.2 – State.
Ms. Jaya Bagwe for respondent No.4 – MCZMA.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 20, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
This order is corrected as per order dated 8 January 2025 to correct the notes of appearance.
1
Ummed Singh Nahata
Union of India
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
