Public interest litigation withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedy; the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 50pil85o24
2024:BHC-AUG:29856-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 85 OF 2024
RAJKUMAR MADHUKAR ABDAL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Shri Ashish Hazari, Advocate h/f Shri Chalak Amol B., Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri S.R. Wakale, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. Shri P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 6.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 16th December, 2024
Per Court :-
The learned advocate for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to
the petitioner to resort to appropriate remedy as is available in law.
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
Rajkumar Madhukar Abdal
The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary
Mangesh S. Patil
Prafulla S. Khubalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
