Court allowed the withdrawal of PIL No. 44 of 2024, with liberty to proceed before the appropriate forum, following the withdrawal of a related larger PIL.
Petition allowed as withdrawn with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy and refund of deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:29855-DB
1 48pil44o24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
48 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 44 OF 2024
SHAIKH NADEEM SHAIKH KAREEM VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Shri R.M. Syed, Advocate h/f Shri Chavan Umakant P., Advocate for the Petitioner.
Ms. V.N. Patil Jadhav, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/State.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL
&
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 16th December, 2024
Per Court :-
The learned advocate for the petitioner, on
instructions and in the wake of the order in Public Interest Litigation No.191/2023 ( Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat
vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ) decided on 20.08.2024 (Principal Seat), seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.
kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
SHAIKH NADEEM SHAIKH KAREEM
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
MANGESH S. PATIL
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
