A public interest litigation was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy, including filing of a writ petition.
Liberty to withdraw the PIL and resort to appropriate remedy including filing of a writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:29083-DB
927.PIL.82.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.82 OF 2024
GORAKSHNATH MANJAPABU MORE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Chaudhari Chetan Barku
… CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE : 10.12.2024
PER COURT:
Leave granted to withdraw the PIL with liberty to resort to
appropriate remedy including filing of the writ petition.
for.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb/
1/1
Gorakshnath Manjapabu More
The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Others
Mangesh S. Patil
Prafulla S. Khubalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
