Public interest litigation dismissed because no petitioner or representative appeared on either call and no adjournment was sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
406-PIL.154.2024
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 154 OF 2024
Digitally signed by JAYANT JAYANT VISHWANATH VISHWANATH SALUNKE SALUNKE Date: 2024.12.18 17:52:56 +0530
Shri Ashok Gorakh Bhadkumbe & Ors. } Petitioners Versus The Maharashtra Industrial } Development Corporation & Ors. } Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Ms. Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader and Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for State.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J. DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2024
P.C.:
1. When the matter was called out in the first half, no one was present on behalf of the petitioners. Even in the revised call, no one is present for the petitioner; neither is there any prayer for adjournment.
2. In these circumstances, the PIL petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Ashok Gorakh Bhadkumbe & Ors.
The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
