Petitioner withdrew the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file a fresh petition. The high court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Liberty to file a fresh petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-ospil78-2024.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.78 OF 2024
Neeraj Triyuginarayan Mishra … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
ATUL GANESH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2024.11.22 16:22:31 +0530
Ms. Tahira Siddique i/by Mr. Ravindra Mali for the petitioner.
Ms. Prachi Tatake, Additional G.P. for respondent No.1 – State.
Mr. G.S. Hegde, Senior Advocate i/by Ms. P.M. Bhansali for respondent No.2 – CIDCO.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : NOVEMBER 22, 2024
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Neeraj Triyuginarayan Mishra
The State of Maharashtra
CIDCO
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
