PIL concerning the Reserve Bank of India was withdrawn by the petitioner, who sought liberty to file afresh; the Division Bench dismissed the petition with that liberty.
Liberty to withdraw and file the petition afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(908)-PIL-72-24.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJIGOVINDRAO GOVINDRAOPANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2024.10.10 19:43:26 +0530
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.72 OF 2024
Hiten Dhirajlal Mehta ...Petitioner
Versus
Reserve Bank of India & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Mandar Soman a/w Jenil Shah i/by Sneha Rane, for the Petitioner.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2024
P. C.
[AMIT BORKAR, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1 of 1
BGP.
Hiten Dhirajlal Mehta
Reserve Bank of India
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
