Public Interest Litigation wherein the petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, disposed of the matter as withdrawn, and ordered return of deposited fees with interest.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; deposit of Rs.1,50,00/- returned with interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:5027-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 52 OF 2022
BABAN ALIAS KISAN PATILBA KAWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH IT’S SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Mr.D.R.Markad, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.S.B.Narwade, AGP for the Respondent/State.
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R.M. JOSHI, JJ.)
DATE : MARCH 5, 2024
PER COURT :
instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.
under :-
“C. That by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature, the respondent authorities specially the respondent no.4 and 5 may kindly be directed to make enquiry about the tender process and work done by the contractor as per the tender issued by the respondent no.6 and work order dt. 30.09.2021 in respect of repairing of internal roads of the village
khs/Mar.2024/52
Nighoj, Tq. Parner, Dist.Ahmednagar and after enquiry, if found illegality and irregularity then take action against the responsible persons.
D. That, the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 may kindly be directed to appoint the competent person for the detail enquiry in respect of the alleged work done by the contractor in respect of internal roads repairing of the Nighoj as per the tender issued by the Grampanchayat dt.20.09.2021.”
07.07.2023, none was present for the Petitioner.
( R.M.JOSHI, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
khs/Mar.2024/52
BABAN ALIAS KISAN PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH IT'S SECRETARY AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
R.M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
