A public interest litigation whose stated issue had already been redressed; the court disposed of the petition without further directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL-35-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Public Interest Litigation No.35 of 2023
[Mr. Sundeep S/o Mr. Radhakrishna and Sasikala Badana VERSUS State of Maharashtra and
others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
Petitioner in person.
Shri A.M. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4.
Shri S.M. Puranik, Counsel for Respondent No.2.
Shri Girish A. Kunte, Counsel for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE: 17thAPRIL, 2024
1. The petitioner in person submits that the issue, which is sought to be
raised in this Public Interest Litigation, is already redressed.2. That being so, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this Public Interest Litigation.
3. The Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
LANJEWAR
Sundeep Radhakrishna and Sasikala Badana
State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court