Partly allowed

Prashant Bhanudas Shankarpure and Another v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy. (Construction), Public Works Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Apr 2024CAW/1163/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil applications to modify an order of 10.01.2024 were partly allowed, permitting the State Government to initiate the promotional process for Executive Engineer posts, conditional on the final outcome of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Permitted the Respondent-State Government to go ahead with the promotional process for the post of Executive Engineer, subject to the final outcome of the writ petition.

Prashant Bhanudas Shankarpure and Another Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:4322-DB

¶2

938-WP-207-2023.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NOS. 991 AND 1163 OF 2024 in WRIT PETITION NO. 207 of 2023

¶4

Prashant Bhanudas Shankarpure and another

¶5

vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶8

Shri R.V. Shiralkar, Advocate for petitioners.

¶9

Ms N. P. Mehta, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Shri S. P. Palshikar, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 to 8.

¶10

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 16^th APRIL, 2024.

¶11

Both these applications are moved by the respective parties to the petition seeking modification of the order dated 10.01.2024.

¶12

It is claimed that the promotional avenue to the post of Executive Engineer to the parties to the petition and other similarly placed persons is already opened and under process with the State Government.

¶13

In such an eventuality, it is claimed that the Court may modify the order dated 10.01.2024 to the extent that the respondent-State be permitted to go ahead with the promotional process, subject to final outcome of the writ petition.

¶14

Since the aforesaid prayer is moved by all the private parties to the petition and the same is not objected to by the State, we deem it appropriate to dispose of both the civil applications, by partly allowing the same.

¶15

Accordingly, we hereby permit the respondent-State Government to go ahead with the promotional process for the post of Executive Engineer, which shall be subject to the final outcome of the writ petition.

¶16

The civil applications stand disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶17

938-WP-207-2023.odt 2

¶18

Writ petition No. 207 of 2023

¶19

Stand over to 25.06.2024 for further consideration.

¶20

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶21

Andurkar.

Prashant Bhanudas Shankarpure and Another v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy. (Construction), Public Works Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Bhanudas Shankarpure and Another v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy. (Construction), Public Works Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjaysingh S/O Mohsingh Bais and Others Vs the Returning Officer, Swagat Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Chandrapur and Others

M/S v P Mukund Engineers and Hotmix Contractor, Thr. Partner, Vinayak P. Mukund Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Water Resource Department, Mumbai and Others

Vinod S/O Kawduji Khobragade Vs the Election Commission of India, Thr. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Ors.

Sunil S/O Mangalchand Mehadia Vs Shri Aseem Gupta, Principal Secretary State of Maharashtra Urban Development Dept., Mumbai

Shyamsundar Garg S/O Pooranchand Garg Vs Union of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Govt. of India, New Delhi Thr. Secretary

Prashant Bhanudas Shankarpure and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy. (Construction), Public Works Dept., Mumbai and Ors.