Public interest litigation withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel after argument; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
401-PIL-4-2024
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 4 OF 2024
Prameya Welfare Foundation .. Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents
Ms. Sumedha Rao i/by Rumana Bagdadi for petitioner. Mr. Vishal Thadani, Additional Government Pleader for respondent no.2-State.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE: 27th FEBRUARY, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Government Pleader for the State.
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel representing the petitioner states that petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the PIL petition.
3. Accordingly, the PIL petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2024.02.27 17:12:52 +0530
1
Prameya Welfare Foundation
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
