The Official Liquidator sought time to furnish a Supreme Court order to demonstrate that EPFO claims have priority over other claims in the liquidation of Twilight Litaka Pharma Ltd. The Court granted time and listed the matter for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-OLR-126-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR’S REPORT NO. 126 OF 2024 IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 471 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 1 OF 1956
AND
IN THE MATTER OF TWILIGHT LITAKA PHARMA LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION)
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD )...PETITIONER
Ms.Sneha Goyal, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Mr.Chandan Kumar, Official Liquidator, present in Court. Mr.Anil Bhagure, Assistant Official Liquidator, present in Court.
CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 19th DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
35-OLR-126-2024.doc
and by this report a 100% dividend is sought to be declared in respect of the claim of the EPFO while the other 22 claims, 1 of worker, 14 of staff, 3 of unsecured creditors and 4 of government dues are yet to be adjudicated.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
ARTI VILAS KHATATE
Digitally signed by ARTI VILAS KHATATE Date: 2024.12.19 18:01:38 +0530
avk 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Official Liquidator should be granted time to file a Supreme Court order regarding the priority of EPFO claims.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Civil Appeal No.9630 of 2011Referred¶12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
