The court granted an expedited heirship certificate to the petitioner, the deceased's wife, dispensing with the issuance of a proclamation under the Bombay Regulation of 1827.
Petition allowed. Heirship certificate granted. Proclamation dispensed with. Grant expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-mpt-588-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
VISHAL
SUBHASH PAREKAR
Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.12.05 17:42:32 +0530
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 588 OF 2024
Sreemathi Thalangan Puthiyaveetil ... Petitioner And Thalangan Rarichan Puthiyaveetil … Deceased
Mr. K.P.P. Nair i/b. Mrs. Asha Nair, for Petitioner.
CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : DECEMBER 04, 2024
P.C.
diligent search, no testamentary writing or Will has been found. The deceased left behind the petitioner and four daughters, the particulars of whom are furnished in the table at paragraph 4 of the petition. There is no other legal heir. The heirship certificate is required to lay claim
over the property described in paragraph No. 6 of the petition.
Vishal Parekar, PS 1/2
24-mpt-588-2024.doc
Hence, the following order :
ORDER
( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )
Vishal Parekar, PS 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an heirship certificate should be granted in favor of a surviving widow.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sreemathi Thalangan Puthiyaveetil
Thalangan Rarichan Puthiyaveetil
N.J.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
