Allowed

Ashok Kumar S/O Kedar Pandit v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 Dec 2024ABA/2489/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail in a cyber police station case alleging credit card reversal fraud against IndusInd Bank. The applicant joined investigation and deposited Rs.10 lakhs. The court made its interim bail order absolute and directed cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Order of interim bail dated 26.09.2024 made absolute; applicant to appear before IO as directed and before Jurisdictional Court if charge-sheeted.

Ashok Kumar S/O Kedar Pandit vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

13-ABA-2489-2024.doc

¶2

1 / 3

¶3

PURTI PRASAD PARAB

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

Digitally signed by PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2024.12.06 13:05:42 +0530 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2489 OF 2024

¶6

Ashok Kumar S/o Kedar Pandit ….Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …Respondent

¶7

¶8

Mr. Santosh Gupta for Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for State.

¶9

---CORAM : N.J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 3^rd DECEMBER 2024

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶12

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.12 of 2024 registered with Cyber Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 419, 406, 420, 465, 467 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC) and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (the I.T. Act).

¶13

By an order dated 26^th September 2024 this court was persuaded to grant interim bail to the applicant observing, inter alia, as under :

¶14

“3. The indictment against the applicant and the coaccused is that the applicant is one of the 34 credit card holders, who have obtained credit reversals without entering into an international transaction. The Indusind

¶15

Purti Parab

¶16

13-ABA-2489-2024.doc

¶17

2 / 3

¶18

Bank was thus defrauded to the tune fo Rs.4,47,31,100/-.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that the applicant had obtained commercial reversal to the tune of Rs.33,27,281/-. Learned Counsel submitted that the demand notice was issued on 14 June 2024 wherein no allegations of fraud and cheating have been made. The applicant has been simply called upon to pay the outstanding amount. Learned Counsel for the Applicant further submitted that to show his bonafide the applicant is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.10 Lakhs with this Court.

¶20

The question as to whether the applicant was a privy to the forgery of the documents and whether the applicant used the forged documents as genuine despite having known that the documents are forged, would warrant consideration.

¶21

In view of the above, I deem it expedient to protect the liberty of the applicant and direct him to join in the investigation.”

¶22

Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions submits that, as undertaken, the applicant has deposited the amount of Rs.10 Lakhs in this court.

¶23

Purti Parab

¶24

13-ABA-2489-2024.doc

¶25

3 / 3

¶26

Learned APP on instructions submits that in terms of the aforesaid order the applicant has appeared before the Investigating Officer on the scheduled dates.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid developments, further custodial interrogation of the applicant does not seem warranted. Thus for the reasons which weighed with this court in granting interim protection, the order of interim bail deserves to be made absolute. Therefore, I am inclined to make the order of interim bail absolute.

¶28

Hence, the following order :

¶29

ORDER

¶30

(i) The Application stands allowed.

¶31

(ii) The order dated 26^th September 2024 granting interim bail to the Applicant is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein.

¶32

(iii) The applicant shall henceforth appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed.

¶33

(iv) In the event charge-sheet is lodged, the applicant shall appear before the Jurisdictional Court regularly.

¶34

Application stands disposed.

¶35

(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)

¶36

Purti Parab

Ashok Kumar S/O Kedar Pandit v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar S/O Kedar Pandit v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rohan Cyrus Gandhy vs Cyrus Russy Gandhy (Deceased)

Pradeep Shantaram Parate and 2 Ors. vs Shantaram Balwant Parate (Deceased)

Trupti Purav Dave vs Purav Vardhishankar Dave (Deceased)

Sufiyan Iqbal Patel and Anr. vs Rizwana Sufiyan Patel (Deceased)

Rutton Pirosha Nanji vs Sam Framroj Lala Alias Sam (Sammy) Framroj Lala (Deceased)

Rajkumar Ramsamuj Mishra vs Ramsamuz Shribhagwat Mishra Alias Ramsamuj Mishra (Deceased)