The court directed both parties to appear before the Coordinator of the High Court Mediation Center for the appointment of a mediator. The matter was adjourned for the mediation proceedings and submission of the report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-mca-67-2024.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2024
Dr. Neha Sushil Kunde … Applicant
versus
Dr. Sushil Shirish Kunde
…. Respondent
Mr. Ajit V. Alange, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. P. Shukla i/b. Mr. Kishan Chaudhari, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 24th JUNE, 2024.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2024.06.25 17:59:36 +0530
1/2
37-mca-67-2024.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
date.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
2/2
Dr. Neha Sushil Kunde
Dr. Sushil Shirish Kunde
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
