Mentioning of two miscellaneous civil applications; by consent the matters were stood over to 7th February 2025, with interim orders directed to continue until the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30 MCA 42 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2024
Runku Manoj Sattyavijay … Applicant vs. Manoj Nana Sattyavijay … Respondent
WITH MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 312 OF 2024
Manoj Dnyaneshwar Sattyavijay … Applicant vs. Runku Manoj Sattyavijay … Respondent
*****
| Mr. Mahendra M. Agarkar :- | Advocate for | Applicant | in |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCA/42/2024 Respondent in M |
and CA/312/202 |
for 4. |
|
| Ms. Divya Pawar :- | Advocate for MCA/42/2024 a in MCA/312/202 |
Respondent nd for Appli 4 |
in cant |
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE : 13th DECEMBER 2024
P. C. :-
1. Mentioned out of turn.
1/2
Kishor
30 MCA 42 of 2024.doc
[S. M. MODAK, J.]
Digitally signed KISHOR by KISHORVISHNU VISHNU KAMBLE KAMBLE Date:2025.01.03 10:49:25 +0530
2/2
Kishor
Runku Manoj Sattyavijay
Manoj Nana Sattyavijay
Manoj Dnyaneshwar Sattyavijay
Runku Manoj Sattyavijay
S. M. Modak
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
