Disposed
Shaikh Zi Ul Huq @ Zia Ul Huq and Anr. v. Celina Coelho Pereira and Anr.
Bombay HCMCA/398/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2024 Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCA 398 of 2024
2024:BHC-GOA:1940
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.398 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4 OF 2023
SHAIKH ZI UL HUQ @ ZIA UL HUQ AND
ANR
... APPLICANTS
Versus
CELINA COELHO PEREIRA AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS
Mr Y.V. Nadkarni, with Mr Ressano Hector Noronha, Mr Nilay Naik and Ms Simran Khadilkar, Advocates for the Applicants. Mr Subodh S. Kantak, Senior Advocate with Mr Somnath Karpe, Ms Neha Kholkar, Ms Samiksha Vaigankar, Ms Siddhi Parodkar, Ms Saicha Dessai, Mr Anand Shirodkar and Mr Kher Simoes, Advocates for the Respondents.
CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED :- 19th November, 2024
P.C.:
VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
Signed by: SANTOSH SHRIDHAR MHAMAL Designation: Senior Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge Date: 19/11/2024 17:37:56
Page 1 of 1
19th November, 2024
Shaikh Z.i Ul Huq @ Zia Ul Huq
Celina Coelho Pereira
Valmiki Menezes
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court