Adjournment order in a criminal revision application. Counsel for respondent no. 1 indicated her inability to continue; the court allowed respondent no. 1 time to engage another advocate and stood the matter over to 08.05.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRIR(F) 824 of 2023
shakuntala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.824 OF 2023 (F)
SHAINE ALEXIUS FERNANDES Versus
THE MADGAUM URBAN CO-OP BANK LTD THROUGH ITS OFFICER KUM ARYA NARVENKAR
... APPLICANT
... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sujay Kamulkar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. Maria Viegas, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Somnath Karpe, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.2.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 23rd April, 2024
P.C.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 1 of 1
23rd April, 2024
Shaine Alexius Fernandes
The Madgaum Urban Co-op Bank Ltd through its officer Kum Arya Narvenkar
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
35 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
