Miscellaneous civil application in an existing writ petition seeking procedural amendment was heard and allowed in terms of the applicants' prayer clause.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); amendments to be carried out during the week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCA 357 of 2024
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.357 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.34 OF 2024
LIZA BRITTO E PEREIRA AND ANR ... APPLICANTS Versus
THE STATE OF GOA, THR. THE CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Ms Vaishali K. Mahato, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri S. Samant, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2.
CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK & VALMIKI MENEZES, JJ.
DATED :- 12th August, 2024
P.C.:
VALMIKI MENEZES, J. M. S. KARNIK, J.
Signed by: SANTOSH SHRIDHAR MHAMAL Designation: Senior Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge Date: 12/08/2024 18:23:30
Page 1 of 1
12th August, 2024
Liza Britto e Pereira
Anr (second applicant)
The State of Goa, thr. the Chief Secretary
Respondent No. 3
M. S. Karnik
Valmiki Menezes
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
