Miscellaneous civil application in which the applicant sought permission to change advocates after the earlier advocate ceased to appear, with an ad-interim relief already granted. The court permitted engagement of a new advocate, accepted the Vakalatnama, directed fresh notice to Respondent No.2 and adjourned the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P-2-MCA-348-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.348 OF 2024
Mrs.Tanaee Rohit Manglekar ...Applicant
V/s.
Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SATISH SANGAR RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2024.12.17 10:07:20 +0530
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.Gaurav G. Nankar:Advocate for Applicant.
*****
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 6th DECEMBER 2024
P. C. :-
Applicant. On hearing him, on 8th August 2024, an ad-interim relief was granted in terms of prayer clause (b).
some reasons. That is why, the Applicant wants to engage a new Advocate. She has averred these facts in her Affidavit. It is annexed to
the praecipe.
Satish Sangar
1/2
P-2-MCA-348-2024.doc
Advocate. The Registry to accept the Vakalatnama.
[S. M. MODAK, J.]
Satish Sangar
2/2
Mrs. Tanaee Rohit Manglekar
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
S. M. Modak
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
