Miscellaneous civil application in a pending second appeal seeking an early hearing. The Court noted only one single judge was handling civil and criminal matters, declined to expedite, and granted liberty to revive the request after six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-GOA:958
MCA 226 of 2024
shakuntala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2024 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.37 OF 2019
CAETANO CAMILO BARRETO REPRESENTED BY THEIR CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY GYA
BARRETO AND ANR ... APPLICANTS
Versus
PEDRO FERNANDES AND ORS
... RESPONDENT
Mr. Ashwin D. Bhobe with Ms. Shaizeen Shaikh, Advocates for the Applicants.
Mr. Siddhart Nunes, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 20th June, 2024
P.C.
Page 1 of 2
20th June, 2024
MCA 226 of 2024
period of six months in case the situation is changed.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 2 of 2
20th June, 2024
Caetano Camilo Barreto represented by their constituted attorney Gya Barreto and Anr
Pedro Fernandes and Ors
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
