Criminal appeal by a credit society against acquittal of an accused in a Section 138 NI Act case; the accused-respondent had expired about a year before hearing, so the appeal stood abated and proceedings were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRIA.24 OF 2024
Shakuntala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.24 OF 2024
THE OLD GOA URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, THR. RECOVERY OFFICER KAJOL A. NAIK ... APPELLANT Versus KISHORE UTTAM RAUT AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Rohan Kuncoliker with Ms. Sangeeta Raul, Advocates for the Appellant.
Mr. Gaurish Nagvenker, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 19th June, 2024
P.C.
P.C.
1. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis of the wireless received from Goa Police states that Respondent No. 1 expired a year back and therefore, the notice is returned unserved.
2. A copy of the wireless message is placed on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Appellant to take necessary steps.
3. Stand over to 19.06.2024.
Page 1 of 2 19th June 2024
CRIA.24 OF 2024
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 2 of 2 19th June 2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Old Goa Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd, thr. Recovery Officer Kajol A. Naik
Kishore Uttam Raut
Respondent No. 2
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
