Applicant sought relief in a matrimonial-related civil application; the underlying Marriage Petition filed by the husband was withdrawn, rendering the application infructuous. The High Court dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:25726
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
984 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 204 OF 2024
Nikita Dattatraya Walke VERSUS
Dattatraya Dnyaneshwar Walke
Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Shivani D. Jayabhar h/f Mr.Jayabhar Shubham Dattatrya Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Shrikant Sali h/f Mr. K. S.Kahalekar
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : October 18, 2024.
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 1 of 1
Nikita Dattatraya Walke
Dattatraya Dnyaneshwar Walke
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
