Archana Rohan Balugade v. Rohan Shamrao Balugade
Case brief
What is this about?
Misc. civil application disposed as infructuous after counsel informed the court that the parties settled their lis. No substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904. MCA-6-2024.docx
Amberkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2024
Archana Rohan Balugade .. Applicant Versus Rohan Shamrao Balugade .. Respondent
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2024
P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Pawar, learned Advocate for Applicant.
2. Mr. Pawar would submit that parties have settled their lis. In
view thereof, present Petition stands disposed as infructuous.
Amberkar
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by RAVINDRA RAVINDRAMOHANAMBERKAR MOHANAMBERKARDate:2024.08.28 19:31:47 +0530
1 of 1
Archana Rohan Balugade
Rohan Shamrao Balugade
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court