Supriya Tushar Pawar v. Tushar Sanjay Pawar
Case brief
What is this about?
Miscellaneous civil application where the applicant's advocate took no steps after notice was issued on 18.06.2024. The court directed service of the respondent by a permissible mode and filing of an Affidavit-in-Reply, and adjourned the matter.
What the court decided
34.mca.184.24.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 184 OF 2024
Supriya Tushar Pawar .. Applicant Versus Tushar Sanjay Pawar .. Respondent
- Mr. Muthu Kutti, Advocate i/by Mr. Nikhil Hire for Applicant.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 2024.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Kutti, learned Advocate for Applicant.
2. In this Misc. Civil Application, notice was issued on
18.06.2024. Thereafter Advocate for Applicant has not taken any steps.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Supriya Tushar Pawar
- respondent
Tushar Sanjay Pawar
Coram
Milind N. Jadhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri Vasant Shankar Thorat Since Deceased Throu. His Representative Vs Sadanand Kadu Shetty
Michele Boutique through Its Partners and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through the Govt. Pleader and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra (through the Special Land Acquisition Officer) vs Smt. Aruna Anant Bhoir (Since Deceased) Thr. Her Lrs. Shri Manoj Anant Bhoir and Ors.
Prajakta Siddhesh Paralkar Vs Siddhesh Paralkar