Mrs. Priyanka Rahul Ghadge v. Mr Rahul Dnyandev Ghadge
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for transfer of Restitution Petition from Thane to Satara court due to inconvenience and pending divorce proceedings. Matter stood over for service of reply affidavit.
What the court decided
LSP 1 17 mca 117.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Misc. Civil Application No.117 of 2024
… Priyanka Rahul Ghadge Applicant V/s. … Rahul Dnyandev Ghadge Respondent. Mr. Atharva R.B. i/b. Mr. Advocate for the Applicant. Vaibhav R.G.
CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J
Digitally signed by LATA LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI PANJWANI Date: 2024.11.30 15:39:03 +0530
DATE : 22 November 2024.
P.C. :
Heard learned advocate for the respondent-wife seeking transfer of the Restitution Petition filed by the respondent-husband from the Civil Judge, Senior Division Thane to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Satara. The reason is inconvenience and her divorce petition is pending before Satara Court.
- Today no one is present for the respondent-husband. On the earlier occasion, the respondent-husband appeared and filed reply affidavit. The reply affidavit is not served on other side. The matter is e-filed. In the reply, he has relied upon one Supreme Court judgment in the case of Anindata Das v/s. Srijit Das1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Priyanka Rahul Ghadge
- respondent
Rahul Dnyandev Ghadge
Coram
S.M. Modak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajesh Suraj Sharma vs Prakash Ramdas Vishwakarma
Rajesh Suraj Sharma vs Prakash Ramdas Vishwakarma
Abdul Rehman Abrar Shaikh and Others vs Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust and Others
Sanghvi Vo-Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs Bai Banabai Mukundrao Dadarkar @ Benabai Mukundrao Dadarkar through Legal Heir 1(A) to 1(E)