The High Court rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay of over six years in filing a First Appeal (Stamp). The court found the reasons cited, which were internal bureaucratic process delays, insufficient to inspire confidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.IA.9865.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9865 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.18931 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9866 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.18931 OF 2023
The Executive Engineer, Raigad …. Applicant
Vs.
Parvati Shankar Baikar & Ors. …. Respondents
Ms. Chaitrali A. Deshmukh for Applicant / Appellant.
CORAM : SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE : 09 AUGUST, 2024
P. C.
Digitally signed by ASHWINI ASHWINI JANARDAN JANARDAN VALLAKATI VALLAKATI Date: 2024.08.09 17:56:35 +0530
Page 1 of 2
09 August, 2024
6.IA.9865.2024.doc
the absence of any sufficient cause being shown. Consequently, other connected Applications too are disposed of as not being necessary to be adjudicated.
[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
Page 2 of 2 09 August, 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of over six years in filing the First Appeal (Stamp) No.18931 of 2023 against the judgment dated 15.04.2017 in Land Reference No.23 of 2006 could be condoned under the Limitation Act
The Executive Engineer, Raigad
Parvati Shankar Baikar & Ors.
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
