Vijay Sharma v. Vivek Makhija
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.08.09 18:41:35 +0530
1 26-ARBAP 123-24-modified.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2024
Vijay Sharma … Applicant V/s. Vivek Makhija & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Anish Sharma i/by Dinesh Tiwari & Associates for the Applicant. Mr. Dipesh Siroya for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 8TH AUGUST 2024
P.C. :
- At the request of Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1, stand over to 22nd August 2024, who submits that his client has not been served with the copy of the Application.
- This is disputed by Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant, who submits that a copy of the Application has already been served. In any view of the matter, he undertakes to serve a copy of the Application on the Advocates for Respondent No.1.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vijay Sharma
- respondent
Vivek Makhija
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court