Disposed

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Devibai Suresh Rathod and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Oct 2024IA/9771/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar ordered two weeks time (excluding Diwali) for applicant to supply copies. Failure may lead to dismissal of interim applications without further Court reference. Time extension granted if copies supplied.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks time excluding Diwali vacation granted to supply copies; failure will lead to dismissal without further reference.

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9770 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9771 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 29175 OF 2023

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 23/10/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered Interim Applications are listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02

¶10

weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time (excluding Diwali Vacation) is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the Interim Applications would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 to 5 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks.

¶12

Sd/-

¶13

REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶14

sat-R(J-II)-23.10.2024

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Devibai Suresh Rathod and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Devibai Suresh Rathod and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thr. Legal Hub vs Smt. Sakhubai Pandurang Chavan and Ors.

Rukhmani Devi Public School Thr. Authorised Signatory vs Tata Classedge Formerly Known as Tata Interactive Systems

Mr. Rahul Balasaheb Awate Vs Shri Shahaji Dhondiba Bandgar and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Company, Thr. the Manager vs Aditya Arvind Khot and Anr.

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai vs Devibai Suresh Rathod and Ors.

The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai Vs Devibai Suresh Rathod and Ors.