Interim application seeking amendment of a pending writ petition before admission was allowed, with amendments to be carried out within one week and served on the Advocate General. Other interim relief sought was deferred to the admission hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 ia 9463-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE
Digitally signed by LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2024.06.19 00:08:12 +0530
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9463 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5640 OF 2024
Tilok G. Lalwani & Anr.
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Adv. Abhijit P. Kulkarni a/w Sweta Shah & Krushna Jaybhay for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl.G.P a/w Ms Kavita Solunke, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATE: JUNE 18, 2024
P. C.
above Writ Petition. Considering that this is a pre-admission amendment, we do not see any impediment in allowing the same. Accordingly, the above Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) which reads thus:
“This Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow the Applicants to carry out the Scheduled Amendments to the main Writ Petition No. 5640 of 2024.”
Laxmi
Page 1 of 2 JUNE 18, 2024
5 ia 9463-24.doc
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 JUNE 18, 2024
Laxmi
1 issue framed by the court
Should the applicants be permitted to amend the main writ petition before admission?
Tilok G. Lalwani
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Colabawalla
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
