Disposed

Jewish Cemetjewish Heritage Trust Thr Its Chief Trusteeery Trust Panvel v. State of Maharashtra Thr Urban Development Dept and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Jun 2024IA/9327/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim order granting interim application for impleadment of an intervener as party respondent and directing compliance with municipal conditions regarding construction near a cemetery.

What did the court decide?

Interim application allowed; intervener impleaded as respondent no. 8; time granted for filing affidavits.

What the court decided

Jewish Cemetjewish Heritage Trust Thr Its Chief Trusteeery Trust Panvel vs State of Maharashtra Thr Urban Development Dept and Ors. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

7-PIL.211.2023

¶2

Jvs.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 211 OF 2023 WITH

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9327 OF 2024

¶6

Jewish Heritage Trust } Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. } Respondents

¶7

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9327 OF 2024

¶8

¶9

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 211 OF 2023

¶10

Jewish Cemetery Trust (Panvel) In the matter between	} Applicant
Jewish Heritage Trust	} Petitioner
versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors.	} Respondents

¶11

Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar with Mr. Rajas Panandikar, Ms.Esha Malik and Mr. Raymond Gadkar i/b. Mr. Raymond Gadkar for petitioner.

¶12

Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader and Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for respondent no. 1.

¶13

Mr. M. V. Thorat i/b. Mr. Rajesh Tekale for respondent no. 2.

¶14

Mr. Jitendra Jagtap for respondent no. 4.

¶15

Mr. Raviraj S. Gamare for respondents 6 and 7.

¶16

Mr. Sanjeev Kadam i/b. Mr. Balraj Bhondare for Intervener.

¶17

CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.

¶18

DATE: 19^th JUNE 2024

7-PIL.211.2023

P.C.:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9327 OF 2024 :

¶23

1. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the subject matter of the PIL petition, this intervention application is allowed. The intervener shall be impleaded as party respondent no. 8, which may file affidavit in reply within two weeks.

¶24

2. The interim application is disposed of.

¶25

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 211 OF 2023 :

¶26

3. The respondents, as prayed, are granted three weeks’ time to file affidavits in reply; rejoinder thereto, if any, may be filed by the petitioner within two weeks thereafter.

¶27

4. Stand over to 24^th July 2024 .

¶28

5. In the meantime, we direct that the conditions put by the Municipal Corporation and undertakings given in respect of the constructions in and around the cemetery shall be followed by the respondents. It shall be the duty of Panvel Municipal Corporation to ensure that all conditions are followed by the parties concerned.

¶29

(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶30

Digitally signed by PRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2024.06.20 16:45:35 +0530

¶31

Jewish Cemetjewish Heritage Trust Thr Its Chief Trusteeery Trust Panvel v. State of Maharashtra Thr Urban Development Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Jewish Cemetjewish Heritage Trust Thr Its Chief Trusteeery Trust Panvel v. State of Maharashtra Thr Urban Development Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mangesh Shankar Kamble vs State of Maharashtra

M/S. Sai Satyam Developers Thr. Partners Ramchandra Parshuram Varak vs Suman Raghunath Karale and Ors.

Silver Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd. vs Divisional Joint Registrar Co. Op Soc and Ors.

Balu Rama Talwar ( Koli ) vs Vivek Prabhakar Joshi

Additional Cjief Secretary Revenue and Forest Department Mantralaya Mumbai vs Bharat T Navale

Forsta Medtech Pvt. Ltd., vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Ministry of Health and Family Welfare