Ramesh @ Bhaijan Mohan Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application in a pending criminal appeal; the court noted that the appellant's counsel had furnished notes of evidence to the State and adjourned the matter for further hearing.
What the court decided
1/1 17 ia 925 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.925 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1276 OF 2023
Ramesh @ Bhaijan Mohan Patil …. Applicant/ Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr.Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr.S.V. Gavand, APP for Respondent – State.
PSI Khose Pairavi Officer, MHB Colony Police Station, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 18th DECEMBER, 2024.
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramesh @ Bhaijan Mohan Patil
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Bharati Dangre
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Jay Kowli vs Secretary General, Boxing Federation of India
Earth an Ngo through Its President vs State of Maharashtra Though Its Housing Department
K.J. Builders and Developers Th. Its Partner J K Giriyolkar vs the State of Maharashtra Th. the Chief Secretary
Luxora Realtors Private Limited vs Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai