Adjournment order in an interim application in a first appeal against the Union of India (Railways). Counsel sought time as papers/files were not traceable; the court directed service on the respondent and listed the matter for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-IA-8781-2024 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8781 OF 2024 IN
FIRST APPEAL(ST) NO. 28543 OF 2022
Sitaram Shivram Chavan And Ors . ...Applicant Versus
The Union Of India, Thr. the General Manager, Central-railway, Mumbai ...Respondent
Adv. Ankit R. Upadhyay i/b Apoorv V. Singh for the Applicants. Adv. Vaibhav Ghogare a/w Sarvesh Gawade i/b Adv. Sandip Ghogare for sole respondent.
CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 16 DECEMBER 2024
P.C.:
Court and requests for an adjournment on the ground that their papers/files are not traceable.
to serve the respondent on or before the next date of hearing, if so not done.
(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.)
Mayur Adane, PA
Sitaram Shivram Chavan And Ors.
The Union Of India, Thr. the General Manager, Central-Railway, Mumbai
Advait M. Sethna
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
