Appeal against trial court's refusal of ad-interim relief in a suit involving the Municipal Corporation. Court did not examine merits, expedited the pending notice of motion, directed status quo till its disposal and disposed of the appeal and interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES JOHNSON Date: 2024.05.09 GONSALVES 17:47:49 +0530
502.ao378-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.378 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.8685 OF 2024 IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 378 OF 2024
Ranchod Narayan Chauhan ...Appellant/Applicant vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai And Anr. ...Respondents
...Appellant/Applicant
Mr Pradeep Thorat, a/w. Mr Akhil Kupade and Ms Purna Pagare, i/b. Vidnyan Daware, for the Appellant.
Ms Smita V Tondwalkar, for Respondent/BMC.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.
Date : 7 May 2024
P.C. :
. This appeal is listed today on account of a praceipe moved by the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant for urgent listing.
1 / 2
502.ao378-24.doc
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against refusal of ad-interim relief should be decided or the trial court directed to decide the notice of motion finally?
Ranchod Narayan Chauhan
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
