This is a one-line order in an interim application for restoration where counsel was absent. The court directed the applicant to file an affidavit regarding the survival of cause and circulated a praecipe. No final disposal or substantive decision was recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.05.10 16:23:06 +0530
Trupti 1 21-ia-8541-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8541 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 12673 OF 2015
… Shri Pandurang Tukaram Kale Applicant
IN THE MATTER OF
Shri Pandurang Tukaram Kale … Petitioner versus
The Chief Administrative Officer, … Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran & Anr. Respondents
Mr.Vinayak Kumbhar i/b. Mr.Sagar A. Mane for the Applicant. Mr. K.S. Thorat, ‘B’ Panel Counsel for the Respondent -State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 10 MAY 2024
P.C. :
. Even for the application for restoration, the learned Counsel for the Applicant is not present. A request is made on behalf of the learned Counsel for the Applicant for adjournment.
Trupti 2 21-ia-8541-2024.doc
(M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Shri Pandurang Tukaram Kale
The Chief Administrative Officer, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran & Anr.
NITIN JAMDAR
M.M.SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
