The court allowed an interim application intervening in a writ petition filed by the original applicant against the State and others, granting the specific prayers without recording detailed reasons in this order.
The interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30-ia791-2024 in wp9654-2018.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.791 OF 2024
ATUL GANESH KULKARNI
Digitally signed byATUL GANESHKULKARNI Date: 2024.01.2414:53:38 +0530
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.9654 OF 2018
Madhav Dada Dhanrao… Applicant
In the matter between
Govind Waman Dhanrao & Ors.… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.… Respondents
Mr. Sanjeev Sawant with Mr. B.K. Barve and Mr.
Sandeep Barve i/by B.K. Barve & Co. for the applicant.
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:JANUARY 24, 2024
P.C.:
1.For the reasons stated therein, the interim application is
allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c).
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Madhav Dada Dhanrao
Atul Ganesh Kulkarni
Govind Waman Dhanrao & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court