Interim application in a pending writ petition seeking leave to amend was allowed in terms of prayers (a) to (c); the court directed the necessary amendments to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-ia2961-2022 in wp1176-2006.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2961 OF 2021
ATUL GANESH KULKARNI
Digitally signed byATUL GANESHKULKARNI Date: 2024.01.2414:53:41 +0530
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1176 OF 2006
Haridas Shivram Vhatkar… Applicant
V/s.
Sarojini Gopal Shinde, since
deceased through LRs & Anr.… Respondents
Ms. Priya Dalvi i/by Pradeep D. Dalvi for the applicant/
petitioner.
Mr. Soham Pawar i/by Mr. Rajesh More for the
respondents.
CORAM :AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:JANUARY 24, 2024
P.C.:
1.For the reasons stated therein, the interim application is
allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) to (c).
2.Necessary amendments to be carried out within two weeks
from today.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Haridas Shivram Vhatkar
Sarojini Gopal Shinde, since deceased through LRs
Anr.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court